Writing as simply as you can

Writing is simply talking without being interrupted. You have all the time to think and you have all the time to deliver the message. Writing is also efficient because the writer does not need to repeat the message.

One thing I learnt about writing is the beauty of simplicity. Simplicity in terms of sentence structure and the type of words used.

Keep your thoughts clean. Write to tell your readers what's on your mind. The shorter the sentence and the entire piece, the better.

Where possible, blog on a platform with minimal scripts. Don't use advertisements. Don't use wordpress.

Start today.

Inflation and your pay

I would like to address the demand for cash balances. How much you will keep in your cash balance is a function of price levels.

If prices fall by 1/3, people will need 1/3 less money in their wallets. In the same way, if prices increase, people will need more money in their wallets.

Wallets is merely a simpler way to address liquidity. The more they need their money, the more liquid they need their savings to be.

Prices of money are determined by supply and demand of money
Purchasing power of money is merely the inverse of price levels. As prices rise, the purchasing power of money falls.

If someone uses fake money to purchase goods and services, the supply of money increases and the new price level will increase. The value of each existing dollar is diluted by the new dollar. This is similar to the inflation process. If the government releases more money into the system, the value of your money decreases.

In other words, if you did not have a pay increase this year, the value of your pay package would have decreased by the level of inflation.

Which is a more dominant force in changing prices? It is the supply of money. Government and financial institutions can collectively employ looser monetary policies to increase the supply of money. Theoretically, they could print money, drop it into your mailboxes and decrease the value of money. They could also lower interest rates to increase lending.

I hope all these are clear. But if there is one thing I would like to stress, it is that the value of your money is determined by the supply of money and the demand for money. The value of your money decreases when there is inflation. Pay increases matching inflation is not an employee benefit. It is to ensure the value of your pay remains the same as the year before.

Websites that disrespect consumers should be made irrelevant

Using too many plugins and scripts? Didn't optimize your images? If you don't respect the pockets of consumers you really don't deserve many viewership.

Consumers can collaboratively boycott these sites. Create your own content. What can you do to generate sustainable content for the Internet? 

1. Use simpler words. Don't embed scripts if you want to tell me your Twitter username, type it. Don't embed the code. 

2. Use plain html. You don't need to customize CSS in a Wordpress environment.

3. Optimize images or don't use images at all.

4. Make impactful content. If they are not impactful, use a social platform.

Website Obesity

As a minimalist, it pains me to see how websites have become "obese", overloaded with information and pictures unnecessarily.

What's taking up so much space? Besides pictures which I feel are necessary for visual impact, the biggest reasons are scripts, advertisements and social sharing functions. Merchants and website makers now feel the feel to overwhelm our websites with dynamic content.

We need to strike back. This is why I dislike Wordpress and have moved most of my blogs back to simpler platforms like blogger.

Who gets hurt when website content gets more "obese"? It is us, the consumers. As we consume more data on mobile phones, we will suffer as websites become more bloated.

Here's what we can do to tackle #websiteobesity

1. Blog on simpler platforms

2. Boycott scripts

Working from home - creating value with lesser footprint

I have been thinking about work. Work is the processing of creating value for society and in return, the worker gets remunerated for the value he or she creates. But in cities, many people travel to office for "work". Work becomes a routine to appear somewhere else. They don't necessary give their best because work is not always motivating. They may not like their bosses, their team or even the work they do.

I am clearer now after observing working styles across Europe, China, Australia, Taiwan and Singapore. People appear to be self motivated when they commit time to work on things they love to do. While this is simple, it's often underrated. Working on something you love creates unspeakable value for yourself - as you created, you have fun. No amount of money can replace this feeling. Bosses and workers are equally responsible for ensuring workers love their work. Without joy, they will come to office late, they will be unhappy every night and look forward to the weekends. This is definitely not what man is made for.

Neither do I advocate that everyone takes on online trading and blogging. Most of these are just eye catchers and don't bring in sustainable income. I'm advocating that everyone be open to take a pay cut to find work nearer to your home and to do something you like. In many circumstances, you may find that you like to bake, make clothes, host friends. Be adventurous and be honest with yourself. You can start a bakery from your home and you can start a B&B if you live in a private apartment in Singapore.

A simpler way is to initiate a pay cut to work lesser hours. Take the hours you saved to think about a new business. The new business does not have to be an online venture, it can be brick and mortar. I own a rather brick and mortar business of tailoring. Anyway, the lines between online and physical sales is blurred. Revenue collection online is now far more convenient.

I advocate that you escape from the 9 to 6 pm lifestyle. Do not work on anything that you don't enjoy. Find that spot that you love and work hard on it. This is not new at all. In the early 1960s and 1970s in Singapore, we used to do household chores for income. My mother was a tailor and my relatives sold products door to door.

How to buy Index Funds in Singapore

I felt this post was necessary to give Singaporeans a no nonsense guide on buying index funds. I'm not paid for this post, so you can be sure this is objective. I was the President of the Society of Financial Service Professionals, Singapore and am a CFA Charterholder.

I won't address why you need index funds again.Going straight to the point, there are 3 ways

1. POSB $100 min a month investment in Singapore Equity and Bond ETF. Search POSB ETFs and you will see a monthly investment plan. There is a sales charge apart from the monthly fee.

2. You can buy ETFs off the exchange. To do this, you need an account with a local broker. You will always need to pay the minimum transaction fee of $25++ per trip.

3. You can buy ETFs off the exchange with Standard Chartered Bank. Note that they will be your custodian, not the CDP. There is no minimum transaction here.

Other ways - you can buy from Fundsupermart, but I am a strong believe of going direct to buy from the exchange, never from an intermediary. 

Important Note on Insurance

The Short Story

Buy term life insurance and critical illness insurance because you will regret if you do not.
The Long Story

Many don’t appreciate insurance. Most regret only during the occurrence of risk events. When these events occur, accidents and prolonged illness can deplete your savings rapidly.

Many may delay the purchase of insurance because it is just to justify the returns from the expense. This is also why investment linked policies seems emotionally easier to sell.

A survey by LIA in 2007 found that the average policyholder is under-insured by as much as $362,000.

Plans that are bundled with savings and investments such as whole life and investment linked products seem to be more popular. The focus on cash value always undermines the importance of protection.

It is hard to price protection. That’s why it takes so much effort to convince someone to buy the protection only product. If agents sell a plan coupled with savings and investments, the product seems more attractive.

Premiums for whole life plans can be much more expensive than a simple term policy. The savings component can be easily parked somewhere else.

To determine the amount of insurance you need, it is good to start with a needs analysis. An advisor will have to understand your circumstances to ascertain how many years of income is needed should a risk event occur.

Many planners do not take into account the required household Cashflow. When planners are more concerned about their own earnings, their clients may suffer from a lack of Cashflow.

It is also not coincidental that the least sold insurance and the cheapest for customers, term, has the least commissions. Term is flexible in terms of coverage horizon. Logically, you may not require life coverage after your retirement because you have no or little earnings power and you should be able to save enough for bequeathing needs. Insurance works best to cover the risk of losing income so that your dependents will not suffer.

Delay the purchase is not a wise decision. If you are struck with some conditions, insurance companies may not admit you into their plan?

Please do not switch plans because there will be an underwriting process. If your health has deteriorated, you may be faced with higher costs or lower coverage.

Truth about insurance

Investment Linked Policies and Wholelife policies are very expensive.

For the first few years, your agent will receive up to half of the premiums you pay. Do you want to enrich someone else or yourself? The better choice will be to invest in Term Insurance which is the cheapest option. Better still, do it yourself. Compare prices online and get the cheapest!
Plain is better than complex.

Some insurance products have multiple critical illness claims. These are very complicated options. Why would anyone claim a partial amount for the first occurrence of cancer and claim the rest during the second? Product originations will do all they can to create weird products. Please just buy plain term products.

Buying direct is better than buying through an agent.

Try not to use agents. They call themselves planners but most of them are not specialists in wealth management. They take some exams and meet the minimum bar to sell products. To trust your money with a stranger, you will really need someone who at least, is a CFA Charterholder or a qualified money manager. Planners do not go through the rigorous quantitative training of financiers. There are simple rules to follow for insurance. If you really need help, find a CFA Charterholder or find an adviser with decades of experience, at least.

Yes, you need Death coverage but up to the extent to cover your income.

Your family should not profit from your death. Just estimate your future earnings and cover up to 10 years of your income. Your family members just need a lump sum to tie over while they recover from death of a relative. The purpose of insurance is to mitigate risk, not for gains.

The Giffgaff effect in Singapore for mobile plans

It’s coming. Myrepublic has hit the pain point. Customers are on the brink of being released from costly data plans. It does seem like the 4th telco understands the need to alter the existing value system. In this era, we use mobile for everything.

Mobile data helps alleviate the pain for travel on public transport and helps Singaporeans execute complex tasks that used to be physically troublesome (pay fines, banking, shop etc).

Hardware has caught up. Our iPhones and new android machines have the same if not more computing power than PCs 5 to 10 years ago. But Singaporean data plan providers have chosen to be milk customers instead of rethinking their value proposition.

Our business models have not caught up. We are still trap with the minimum 300 mins and 1000 sms. Those are base fees that force you to commit $15 dollars for nothing. Hardly anyone uses calls and sms. Above that, they layer prohibitive fees for data — especially if you exceed the amount of data you contracted for. That’s not pay per use. That’s a fine.

The government has generally stood by these telcos because frankly they are local champions. They employ a lot of Singaporeans and higher profitability means good pay and good returns to Singaporean workers and investor. But the lack of competition prohibits innovation.

We badly need cheaper mobile data plans. Kids and students need to consume more data. We don’t want to micro manage what they do with it. But we want kids to be at the forefront of technology. Be exposed. That’s the first step. We also need every Singaporean to be mobile ready so we can implement smart nation initiatives. We could possibly be using mobile phones to tap on MRTs, we could mass adopt smarter payments systems and we could help formulate better policies with data.

The current pricing model is unsustainable. The Giffgaff effect has arrived. We will see a telco serve an entirely different segment (I believe this is the new majority) of customers who want cheaper mobile data and little or less other value added service. It’s a battle of pricing model. Check out our peers in Taiwan, Japan and even the medieval UK.

One day we will see no frill plans like this

• 10 gb, 15 mins talk time, 100 sms — $60
• Unlimited data — $80 to $100

If you read this, share it or respond so our politicians know what we want and can reflect this in parliament. Takes too long for our conglomerates to understand the shifting grounds globally. Perhaps they already do, but they prefer you be exploited.

BreadTalk and Trust

We recall how Bread Talk represented that the soya milk they sold were fresh. But we later found out it was Yeo's soya milk. Arguably, not as fresh as they want it to sound. Post this incident, I have hardly purchased anything from Bread Talk.

Businesses that can win the trust of consumers develop competitive advantages. Consumers are happier to be associated with the brand and they are prouder to share their purchases with their friends in person and on social media platforms.

A firm needs to build moral capital in order to lead effectively in their respective sector. Moral leadership gives legitimacy for the firm to transform their businesses. Especially in Asia, a virtuous company must understand that it cannot pursue profit at the expense of its customers.

The basic elements of a virtuous organisation comprises courage, perseverance and discipline. In recent news, BreadTalk seems to lack all three of these elements. They lack the courage to come clean about your mistakes, they show a clear lack of perseverance and discipline to grow their business the right way.

I am skeptical about the future growth of a firm that chooses to lie about their products to their customers. I am skeptical about BreadTalk as a symbol of success in Singapore.

Change or be changed

Singapore must take a leadership role in so-called disruptive technologies like third-party apps such as Uber and GrabCar. If we do not innovate and create disruptive technologies, we may not be well placed to react to global trends in time, to our detriment. We have seen how Uber disrupted the taxi industry. Years earlier, data-based messaging services such as WhatsApp disrupted the SMS business. Paypal and mobile payment systems eroded the retail businesses of banks.

Some countries with more resources and a larger domestic market may be able to withstand such blows, and mitigate these effects of disruption at later stages. Singapore does not enjoy such luxury. We must be at the forefront of these disruptive technologies. In the case of Uber for example, it would be very much in line with our economic strategy to persuade Uber to move its Asian headquarters to Singapore.

Some still hold the view that we can resist such technological disruptions, such as through regulatory legislation, in order to protect local interests. We would only be creating inefficiencies, and allow the world around us to move ahead.

The process of technological disruption will be painful. Admittedly, disruption may threaten some jobs. But if we can lead the way, we create for ourselves more time to mitigate the effects of any such negative socio-economic situations. This is a crucial learning process helps to boost our resilience towards potentially catastrophic changes, which are beyond Singapore’s control anyway.

The next frontier for disruption would be the service industry, especially within the F&B sector. Eatsa, a high-tech fast food restaurant recently opened in San Francisco. Eatsa revolutionaries the dining experience with full automation of almost all processes in a F&B business, especially in serving food and cashiering. With the exception of a few kitchen staff, there is not a human in sight. The restaurant has received good reviews. This marks a new era — technology has begun disrupting the low skilled service industries.

Singapore’s service industries currently requires a considerable low-skilled labour force. This has all sorts of political ramifications with regard to debates on immigration, which sometimes borders on xenophobia. Disruptive technologies like what Eastsa is pioneering is therefore the natural way forward.

Policy makers cannot shield Singaporeans from these changes. Singapore and Singaporeans will be worse off, if we over-regulate such technological innovations. It makes more sense for us instead to adapt to such changes. Beyond adapting to changes, we will also need to take the lead in the disruption of established industries.

Regression to the mean

I want to talk about regression to the mean because this will transform the investment industry.

Look at the table above. Well performing funds do not stay at the top. They revert to the mean. This implies if you had bought a fund simply because it made good results in the past, you are more likely to lose. Simply put, if you came first, overtime you will underperform to emerge somewhere in the middle (the mean).

I get it that many professionals tell you they have insights. They print beautiful brochures. Anyone can report good results. Think about it this way, you came in 20th in a class of 40th. How do you show you did well? Well, you can say you were top 5 of those who went to the same club as you did. You could also say you were first in the entire neighborhood you stay in. These could be facts. But it does not take away the fact that you only came in 20th.

• Fund performance is hypothesized to be random
• Cost and fees are everything. Buy the cheapest that gives you the broadest diversification
• Please buy funds yourself, direct, not through advisors. They take a big cut

Con men and cheaters who teach you how to trade for a lot of money

Many errant businessmen are selling trading courses. No one with a working formula will reveal their “magic formula” for a few thousand dollars. The efficient market hypothesis states that any formula that takes, if released into public hands and if adopted by the public, will result in the nullification of the effects of the formula.

But the case is different if the formula is one based on simple probability. 50% of the time it works, 50% of the time it does not work. You sell the formula for thousands, show the cases when it works, find a reasons when it does not. Offer advice on hindsight, give many caveats for future looking tips. This is an old business. People have sold gambling tips over centuries. Today, the same con men are legitimizing this trade by dealing with regulated instruments like stocks.

Let me unveil the business model. They get you in to attend a free course, hype you up, sell a 3 to 4 day course for thousands. At the end of the course, they sell you more courses and formulas and unique programs. You get sucked into the program. Just when you think this is it, there’s more. You signed up with one of the brokers they brought. Every trade you make, they make a fee, or at least, they earned an introductory fee.

If you want to learn how to trade FX or stocks, read a proper textbook. There is no short cut. Keep a few honest financial blogs. There’s not many.