中国社交电商不仅是社交和电商

当你打开手机,刷起FacebookInstagram, YouTubeTwitter,或者Snapchat时,是否留意到,它们已经开通“shop”功能了。或许你倍感新奇,跃跃欲试,抑或者踌躇观望,甚至不甚看好,瞧瞧资本市场的反应。消息一出,Snapchat的股价一度上涨了5%。而这一切才刚刚开始。你更无法相信的是,这些还是从中国的社交电商们抄袭来的。

移动互联网时代带来的流量市场演变,让社交电商的优势日益凸显,利用社交渠道的裂变流量,成了更多企业的选择。据电数宝的数据分析,2019年,中国社交电商的用户规模达7.13亿人,行业从业者4800万,交易规模20605.5亿元。而到2020年,这些数据变成了7.8亿人,7900万,和23000.5亿元,社交电商在中国电子商务渗透率已接近70%

 


 

依托庞大的移动设备用户群体和完善的电子支付体系,中国的社交电商们已经发展得风生水起,五花八门了。目前社交电商大概可以分为五个品类,分别是拼购类、会员分销类、内容直播类、导购类、和社区团购类。

拼购类社交电商是拼购平台通过特色、低价的商品吸引社交流量参与社交电商平台的拼团、砍价消费的行为。如拼多多。

会员分销类社交电商是以S2B2C模式运作实现商品流通。平台组建商品供应、物流、售后等零售服务能力,并通过会员用户/B进行分销、分享裂变等引流变现。

内容直播类社交电商指经销售商内容(文字、短视频、直播等社会化媒体传播方式形式)创作后,分享购物体验、商品特征等,吸引新增用户,以触发消费者体验和购买并最终实现销售为目标的电商模式。如抖音电商等。

社区团购类社交电商的模式围绕线下生活社区,以社群为主要交易场景,以熟人社交关系为纽带,平台通过团长触达社区用户,完成销售。目前主要有美团优选、多多买菜、兴盛优选、十荟团等。

某些社交电商的优点也吸引传统电商来效仿,比如直播类社交电商对人与场进行创新,融入主播、MCN机构等参与者,在商品详情页的基础上丰富营销场景,推动三要素更为紧密的结合。与传统电商相比,直播电商对人、货、场的优化,驱动用户购物体验升级,在营销效果与用户转化层面优势明显。从2016年试水直播带货功能后,淘宝,这个中国最大的电商平台,销量成倍增加。《淘宝直播2021年度报告》显示,2020年淘宝上诞生了近千个成交突破1亿元的直播间,90%的新品牌都已在淘宝直播间开播,而且这些新品牌的成交增幅达到了329%

对非大陆群体来说,最为熟悉的中国社交电商应该是抖音了。从20183月的百万粉丝账号上线购物车功能跳转淘宝,到202010月的切断第三方平台链接独立运营,短短三年,这个视频平台的直播交易规模从100亿元增加到5000亿元。如今抖音已经占据中国直播电商排行榜的第三名,成功走出了自己的电商之路。

 20213月的抖音电商榜首罗永浩为例,如同广大明星、主持人和网红一样,这位锤子科技CEO自从发现直播带货的巨大商机后,果断加入。2020326日,罗永浩正式宣布抖音成为其独家直播带货平台,并于当年41日晚完成了直播带货首秀。数据显示,首次直播支付交易总额超1.1亿元,累计观看人数超4800万人。如今, 罗永浩每周三到周末19点开始直播,平均每场六小时,粉丝数(全平台)已有1750.21万,共获赞3233.9万次。20213月,罗永浩以销售件数218.2万,成交金额4亿元的成绩列抖音电商榜首。在刚过去的五一黄金周,罗永浩直播间的预计销售收入为1.05亿元。

而与明星达人云集,专长于服装美妆等颜值类的直播类社交电商相反的是,社区团购紧盯着的是普通生活里的一日三餐,帮家庭主妇们省时省钱省事。这种2016年在中国湖南地区兴起的“预售+自提”的购物模式,以低廉的价格和高效的配送,成功俘获三四线城市以及广大农村用户的心。尤其是在疫情期间,基本零接触的操作方式使得其在大江南北迅速地火起来。如今,中国的社区团购已经拥有750亿元的年交易规模和4.7亿的用户量,并且这个数字还在爆发式地增长中。

如今,“低头族”群体愈发壮大,敏锐的开发者们也与时俱进地把各种购物渠道转移到了智能手机里,让消费更加便捷。比起传统电商,社交电商在是在社交的前提下发展消费,也就是在信任的基础上开展交易。然而高速的发展暴露出来许多商家管理上的不足,质量问题等负面新闻很容易让消费者尤其是新试水网购的群体产生信任危机。此外,社交购物的巨大市场也吸引得很多互联网巨头纷纷下水,砸钱扩大经营抢占市场。早期的低价厮杀惹得战局一片火热。然而当热度褪去,如何留住消费者,在某个细分领域拥有自己的优势,中国的社交电商们还在探索中。也希望海外的玩家们引以为鉴,少走弯路。


Black swan - thoughts

Book " black swan"

Even though we're constantly making predictions about the future, we're actually terrible at it. We put far too much confidence in our knowledge and underestimate our ignorance. Our over-reliance on methods that seem to make sense, our basic inability to understand and define randomness, and even our biology, all contribute to poor decision making, and sometimes to "Black Swans" –  events we believe to be impossible but which end up redefining our understanding of the world.

Perhaps the best defense against falling into the cognitive traps we've seen is a good understanding of the tools that we use to make predictions, and their limitations.

While knowing our own limitations certainly won't save us from every blunder we'll ever make, it can at least help us to reduce our bad decision-making.

For instance, if you're aware that you are subject to cognitive bias, like everyone else, then it's much easier to recognize when you're only looking for information that confirms what you already believe to be true.

Likewise, if you know that we humans like to organize everything into neat, causal narratives, and that this kind of approach simplifies the complexity of the world, then you'll be more likely to search for further information to gain a better view of the "whole picture."

Just this small amount of critical self-analysis can help you gain a competitive advantage over others in your field.

It's certainly preferable to be aware of your shortcomings. For example, if you know that there will always be unforeseeable risks in pursuing any opportunity, despite how promising that opportunity seems, you'll probably be less inclined to invest heavily in it.

While we cannot triumph over randomness or our limited capacity for understanding the vast complexity of our world, we can at least mitigate the damage inflicted by our ignorance.

Community Group Buying as China’s Next Battlefield – Who Will take the Lead?

Understand what contributes to the success of the Community Group Buying model in China and who are the major players in the market.


While citizens worldwide wear face masks and queue up in grocery markets, the Chinese homemakers are getting fresh grocery deliveries within a few taps on their phones. Community group buying (CGB), a contact-free model started in 2016 for online grocery retail, took off during the pandemic. It now has all of China's tech giants looking for a share of the pie. In 2020, the total transaction value of China's CGB market more than doubled to RMB72 billion (US$11.2 billion).


Source: data.iimedia.cn

A CGB service collates small orders from households living within approximate locations and form bulk orders to lower the unit price of the items, working as a decentralized Costco. A designated community leader, such as a convenience store owner, will form a WeChat group to list available products for delivery. Products on the platforms can range from fresh shrimps to face masks. Individuals can order through affiliate links in the group, and the orders are collated into a bulk order for the community leader. The next day, orders will be delivered to the self-pickup spot users choose, usually at the leader's convenience store. The leader gets 10%-12% of the sales commission per order through this process while bringing extra visitors to the store. 


Key factors contributing to the success of CGB

 

1. An integrated ecosystem

 

The WeChat ecosystem, which consists of WeChat Pay, WeChat mini-programs inserted into WeChat App, and 1.2 billion monthly active users, allows the efficient and scalable spread of CGB. A complete supply chain, with takeaway businesses harnessing their warehousing and distribution capacity (built from fresh grocery e-commerce, for example), makes it possible for next-day delivery and early procurement. 


2. Effective Customer Strategy


Customers in large cities value efficiency, while consumers in lower-tier cities are more price sensitive. The price sensitivity of customer groups in lower-tier cities makes CGB more attractive, which is why it became the main battlefield for CGB companies. Compared to young people living alone, a family of three tend to look for cheaper goods and stock up. Considering the buying habits of different consumer profiles, companies target bigger family sizes for CGB.  


Major Players



Statistics on demographics and consumer behaviour 


The 2020 China Social E-Commerce Consumer Shopping Behaviour Research Report from Internet Society of China showed that CGB consumers are mostly housewives aged 25 to 50 and living in second to fourth-tier cities. About 78% of the community leaders are female, married, home-based with extra time, and looking to improve the family's quality of life.  




Frequency: more than half of the CGB consumers order at least once a week, and 11% order daily.


Average Transaction Value (ATV): more than half of the orders are below RMB100 (US$15).

Category: fresh products are the most popular. 



The CGB process starts from suppliers to central warehouses, warehouse networks, pickup points and finally reaching the consumers. Such a model introduced by the CGB platforms eliminates the middleman and minimizes costs. CGB offers a vast range of product choices and contact-free and fast delivery at affordable prices during the lockdown period. Despite its rapid growth, businesses have encountered many problems in the past year:


· Many CGB start-ups tend to recruit more community leaders than they can handle to seize the market, causing unhealthy competition. 

· The market tends to be homogeneous due to the similar product structure of each brand.

· Many community leaders registered with multiple brands and promoted the most profitable one.

· The low-price strategy at the beginning impacted the traditional businesses, which called for government intervention.

· The model of online grocery shopping still poses a risk to consumers. Product quality cannot be guaranteed due to next-day delivery, while the process for refund or return remains complex.

· Most brands do not offer direct after-sales customer service. They often rely on one single community leader to support the entire group, resulting in a poor customer experience.


At the moment, the business model of CGB is at the starting phase. Replicating a successful model is impossible as major brands are still figuring it out themselves. Through sound data analysis, improvement of internal management, and customer service enhancement, companies can better understand user demand and optimize resource allocation. These factors are critical to winning a place for themselves in the CGB market.

社区团购的百团大战

当你即使全副武装,却依然担心去超市的途中感染病毒时,中国的农村大妈们已经熟练地在手机上买菜买水果了。社区团购,这种零接触的电商模式,正悄然改变人们的生活。2016年在中国兴起,期间几次被唱衰,一场疫情又让它成为市场的新宠,引得互联网巨头们纷纷入场。艾媒咨询所发布的数据显示,2020年中国社区团购的交易规模为720亿元,比上一年多出一倍以上。

数据来源:艾媒数据中心(data.iimedia.cn)

社区团购是一个社群预售+次日门店自提的零售模式。将每个小订单合并成大订单从而获得更低的价格,可以理解为一个去中心化的Costco。具体而言,团长,例如一个便利店老板,在微信群里发布商品的链接,群友们通过该链接下单拼团,隔天去指定的地点自提,自提点通常就是团场的便利店。团长可从订单中获取10%-12%的佣金,同时也给自己的便利店带来了额外的客流量。平台提供的产品种类从新鲜鱼虾到50公斤装的猪饲料,满足大小家庭的日常生活需求。社交、营销和下单整个流程都在微信一个APP上完成。

社区团购的发展离不开两个方面:

一是基础设施的完善

  1. 微信生态。微信支付、流量传播、分销逐渐被大家接受,而且小程序的出现,使得各种各样的服务在微信社群中更容易使用。1.2亿的月活使得微信可以覆盖各种圈层的用户,特别是低线城市中微信几乎是除了智能手机这类硬件外渗透率最高的触点。拼多多的快速增长也验证了微信生态的强大。
  2. 供应链完善。外卖、生鲜电商等模式带来的仓储配送的前期建设,使得次日达、原产地采购对效率要求得以实现。

 二是消费者决策要素。

  1. 消费分层。一二线城市消费者更看重效率,三四线城市消费者时间充裕更看重价格,所以三四线城市是社区团购重点发力的方向。
  2. 社交化购物。小红书、拼多多、微商等社交电商的发展,验证了圈子对消费者决策的影响力。
  3. 场景化消费。在高榕资产的零售模型中讲到,不该用人作为最小粒度来理解购买行为,而应该从场景去看。比如三口之家的购买习惯和独居青年的购买习惯完全不同,三口之家更讲求实惠往往会囤货,这是社区团购的受众。 

社区团购主要品牌对比

从消费群体来看社区团购

中国互联网协会社会电商工作组发布的2020中国社交电商消费者购物行为研究报告》显示,从性别来看,社区团购的用户主要为2-4线城市的中青年女性,具体来说,主要是25-50岁之间的已婚女性,负责采购家庭饮食日常,对价格敏感。该研究称,83%的社区团购用户为女性,其中已婚比例占到92%。同样社区团购的女团长们也占到78%。她们多为3-4线及以下的25-45岁的女性,普遍已婚,居家赋闲,对提高生活质量水平需求强烈。 



从频次上看,34.4%的用户偶尔在社区团购消费,12%每月消费1-2次,29.6%每周1-2次,13.3%每周3-5次,有10.7%的人每天至少一次消费。

从金额来看,20%的人单次购买金额小于50元,消费在50-100元的占35.1%100-300元的占36.4%300-500元的占5.8%500元以上的占2.7%

从产品品类来看,48.9%为水果生鲜,45.3%为粮油调料,41.8%为零食饮料,34.2%为家居用品,33.3%为洗护用品,13.8%为母婴用品,4.9%为其它。 


社区团购平台 供应商中心仓网格仓自提点消费者的流通方式,极大的缩短了中间环节,节约成本。低廉的价格,丰富的品种,快速的配送,无需接触过多人群,使得社区团购能切中消费者的软肋,尤其是疫情当前。然而社区团购这几年的发展也暴露出不少问题:

1.                  不少企业为了抢占市场,盲目扩张,自身供应链却跟不上,团长招募过多,素质参差不齐,易出现内部竞争。

2.                  各大品牌的产品结构类似,同质化严重。目前各品牌的收入60%-70%来源于生鲜产品。

3.                  全凭团长推广市场,客源掌握在团长手里。不少团长同时代理多个品牌,通常优先考虑自身利益来选择品牌推销。

4.                  初期的低价抢占市场让实体企业怨声载道,公众反响差,政府出手收紧行业管控。

5.                  从线上采购生鲜这类易损坏产品对消费者来说依然具有一定风险,品质不稳定,退换不方便,单纯靠低价来吸引顾客不是长久之计。

6.                  没有直接的售后服务,全靠团长来沟通联系,反应链条过长。

目前社区团购的发展模式依然不成熟,基本没有成功的经验可复制,各大企业都在努力走出自己的路:如兴盛优选最初的口号复兴门店同程生活并购广东本地生鲜连锁品牌千鲜汇,在湖南推出B2B批发业务,入驻抖音橙心优选开出自己第一个线下门店;美团集团来个美团买菜”+“菜大全”+“美团优选的组合拳。比拼完资本、品牌和流量的狂热过后,只有利用好数据分析,完善内部管理,提升服务,才能更精确的把握市场需求,优化资源配置,在细分市场打造出特色,赢得自己的一席之地。 

Why will China change the world?


(blinkist adaptation)

Blockchaining Chicken

In the Western imagination, we characterize China by crowded megacities like Shanghai, Beijing, and Shenzhen. Today, many young people move to China’s most prominent cities in search of work. Yet, 40 per cent of the population still lives in the countryside. China’s latest novel creation can be found in a remote village called Sanqiao. Here, in the impoverished mountainous region of Guizhou, you’ll discover GoGoChicken, the first blockchain chicken farm.

Enter the blockchain chicken farm. This company raises high-quality, free-range chickens. These birds sell at a premium price to wealthy diners in the coastal cities. But these consumers want a guarantee that the chickens they’re buying are the chickens that are advertised.

Each chicken is tracked and monitored from the moment it’s born until it reaches the table. A chicken’s data is compiled and stored using blockchain technology. This distributed record-keeping system makes it extremely difficult to falsify any information. So, you can scan a code and see its entire life on a special website when you buy a blockchain chicken. This way, you truly know what you’re about to eat.

Online learning is re-educating China

City dwellers have much better access to education than countryfolk. Only 10 per cent of rural residents continue education after high school. In some regions, the high school dropout rate is above 50 per cent. To remedy this, China has turned to online learning.

In 2015, an elite urban high school, called Number 7 High School, began live-streaming classes for students in rural areas in Yunnan and Guangxi. Initially, the experiment was a failure. Poor internet infrastructure and family obligations kept rural students from really benefiting from the initiative. But, three years later, 88 of these students were accepted at Tsinghua and Peking Universities. It’s unclear if the program will work on a larger scale, but this small success is promising.

Piracy or innovation tweaking?

There’s some truth to this. In China, there’s a concept called shanzhai, which is a derogatory term for pirated goods. That’s because rural mountain villages have sometimes created whole economies around making imitation products, from pirated DVDs to fake designer handbags. Of course, these shanzhai economies only work by ignoring intellectual property rights.

While shanzhai can be about creating knockoff iPhones, it can also be something more. The idea that anyone can adapt and repurpose existing ideas for their ends actually opens a whole new field of innovation. That way, creative engineers can share ideas and remix products into an astounding array of new devices, even with few resources.

Just take a stroll through the Huaqiangbei electronics market, you’ll find hundreds of small-scale companies making everything from 3D printers to simple modular cell phones you can augment and repair on your own. This massive array of incredible shanzhai shows that China’s culture of swapping, sharing, and DIY manufacturing is a type of innovation all of its own.

China’s surveillance state has both practical and ethical problems.

In the popular imagination, China is an authoritarian state where the state closely tracks everyone. It’s true that the government monitors and restricts information in the media and on the internet. But China’s actual surveillance operation is less slick than you might think.

Consider a city like Guiyang. Authorities are attempting to catalogue all the residents into a massive database. But urban villages are populated by an ever-shifting community of rural migrants, so the task isn’t easy. Even after years of work, the spotty database includes only 60,000 people.

Companies like Face++ might offer a solution. This Beijing-based start-up makes facial recognition software for private companies and the Sharp Eyes program — a government initiative that aims to use surveillance cameras to monitor public spaces. Still, despite the hype, the program has stalled. Chinese cities still have fewer surveillance cameras than those in the US. And the software isn’t always as accurate as advertised.

Often, a camera’s facial scan can misidentify a person or fail to see a face at all. Even when data collection and surveillance efforts do work, there remains a host of ethical problems. For one, these programs generally target poor and minority communities. This excessive focus can create lopsided crime statistics that unjustly stigmatize these populations. And once the system has singled someone out, their negative data can follow them for life, even as they grow and change as a person.

Internet commerce ties remote villages to the global economy.

Shangdiping, a tiny village of 900 people in the mountainous Guizhou Province, was connected to the world only through a meandering footpath through the hills. That all changed in 2018 when a paved road was built.

Shangdiping, like many remote villages, is slowly changing. It’s now a patchwork mix of traditional and modern lifestyles. Farm animals still wander the streets, but there’s a flashy new internet cafe. The town’s single restaurant has no signage or set prices, but you can pay your bill with the smartphone app WeChat.

Many of these changes result from a nationwide effort to integrate China’s rural communities into the broader economy. At the heart of this effort is e-commerce. Villages have been adapting to the internet economy. This change is fueled by the e-commerce giant Alibaba and its website Taobao.com, a major shopping platform. In 2013, the company launched the Rural Taobao strategy. It aimed to transform rural communities into hubs of online commerce. First, the company opened Rural Taobao Service Centers to help villagers buy goods from Taobao.com. Then, it sent officials to teach residents how to sell goods on the website.

Do Singaporeans fear voting out ministers and potential ministers?


Before WP’s first GRC win, Singaporeans believed that losing a Minister or incoming Minister had a great impact on our future. After the lost of George Yeo, we recovered. Singaporeans also failed to elect Mr. Ong Ye Kung, then touted as part of the 4G leadership. Singapore didn’t fall apart.
A lot of military men in government
In the latest election, Singaporeans discarded high profile military man and former Minister Ng Chee Meng. There was no evidence Singaporeans had much unhappiness against the Minister, but there was much frustration against the ruling party in favour of the Workers Party. In addition, future PM Heng Swee Keat won with a razor thin margin of ~54% against Workers Party.
The slow and steady rise of Worker’s Party
Will Singaporeans be even more courageous in future elections just to send the right message? I bet they will. If the PAP continues to employ the tactic, placing important Ministers in GRCs against WP, they will continue to lose.

In the near future, if we may less technically sound MPs. Less of them will come from military and GLC backgrounds, more of them will come from SMEs, normal households. By then, Singaporeans can enjoy a better mix of ideas that take care of the general Singaporeans.

Who will govern Singapore in 2025?

Singapore had their elections again in 2021. Like before, the PAP dominated seats in Parliament. Facts are Singaporeans prefer a stable government, same faces, same party, same philosophy. 

But things will change quickly in a few years’ time. PM in waiting, Heng Swee Keat, beat the Workers’ Party 53 to 47%. That is slim. Certainly Singaporeans should have given the future PM better mandate. But this didn’t happen. Singaporeans certainly feel positive about younger and more talented oppositions. The Ramus Lim and Nicole Seah effect highlighted how easy it is for opposition to 1) win over younger talents to run as candidates, and 2) challenge incumbent ministers. 

Former PAP MP Dr. Tan Cheng Bock’s PSP, challenged the incumbent PAP government and almost beat the PAP in West Coast GRC. Slowly, but surely, as the political climate matures in Singapore, we will see more opposition victories. This does not reflect a weakening PAP. This simply reflects the fundamental need for pluralism and differing voices in Parliament. Singaporeans want this even if the opposition candidates seem to be less qualified than those candidates in PAP. 

I fear that politics in Singapore is getting more divisive in two extremes, with new citizens and relatively well to do Singaporeans voting for PAP, and the “others” voting for opposition. I expect WP to win more than 2 GRCs in the next election by 2025. If Dr. Tan Cheng Bock manages PSP well for another 3 to 5 years, Singaporeans can expect Dr. Tan’s team to attract even more talent to take away 1 to 2 GRCs from PAP. 

It is possible that by as soon as 2025, PAP may not have its 2/3 majority. This means, PAP will still govern Singapore. Singaporeans will have about a decade to prepare scenarios where PAP does not form government.

Some questions Singaporeans have to answer for themselves 

  1. Do Singaporeans want to accept the establishment, where government linked companies (“GLC”) still dominate businesses. In addition, we still field a lot of candidates from GLCs. Does this create a perception that GLCs are somewhat politically linked?
  2. Do Singaporeans want Ministers that may not be as technically competent, but actually care a lot more for the heart of Singapore? I.e. Will Singaporeans prefer Ministers that fight for rights of Singaporeans even if these policies are less effective to grow the economy?
  3. Do Singaporeans want a parliament where one party cannot pass new laws as and when they please? Do we want a parliament that can hold different views? Do we want opposition parties strong enough to check on the ruling party?

Stop wasting time in meetings and emails

Tips on presentation

In most situations, you have no more than a few minutes to pitch an idea. In my experience, you should cut the fluff. Focus on key information. In today's fast-paced, digitally connected world, people are constantly bombarded with information. They have no time for you. Most are sceptical and quick to pass judgement.

There is a big difference between what you think you need to say and what you need to say. We tend to say more than we need to. In my experience, just tell them what's in it for them, tell them specific numbers, be upfront. Avoid passive tense. Say it as it is.

For technical questions, come prepared show answers in reports and annexes. Leave time for Q and A. Open the meeting by telling them why you are here. Tell them what you need them to decide on.

Tips on writing

8 Golden rules

·         Never use a metaphor, simile, or other figure of speech, which you are used to seeing in print.

·         Never use a long word where a short one will do. (Be direct!)

·         If it is possible to cut a word out, always cut it out. (Be concise!)

·         Never use the passive where you can use the active. (0 passive allowed!)

·         Never use a foreign phrase, a scientific word, or a jargon word if you can think of an everyday English equivalent.

·         Break any of these rules sooner than say anything outright barbarous.

The price of Singapore cheap labour

We employed cheap foreign labour for low value-added services to increase margins in sectors such as construction and shipping. There are unseen costs to society, such as displacement of Singaporeans, lowering of wages, and the environment.
It is heartwarming for human rights organizations to address low living conditions for these foreign workers. Many have done the right thing to feed them, help them and push policymakers for better living conditions.
But we are not addressing the main problem. Should labour be this cheap?
This is a suitable time to ask this question. As we try to house foreign workers in better dormitories, space them out further, business bottom line will be affected. What if we increase the pay of construction workers, foreman, and attract Singaporeans to take on these jobs?
Businesses and government previously shared how Singaporeans are unwilling to take on these hard jobs. Any job will be unattractive if the compensation does not commensurate with effort.
We have seen how global pandemics can impact the supply chain of labour, raw materials and even food. We need to reduce our dependence on foreign workers. Businesses may claim that they need these workers to balance their books. But they do not see the real costs (addressed above). Increase the wages, put more locals back in these positions.

You need simplicity

Bullet journals, desktop calendars, online to-do lists … with so many productivity apps and hacks floating around, it's surely never been easier to reach peak productivity, right?

Wrong.

All those apps and life hacks promote organization and efficiency. And that's great! After all, living with chaos is stressful. When you're disorganized, important tasks and memos slip through the cracks, and you fall behind, which is enough to make anyone stressed.

But downloading a plethora of productivity boosters is not the answer. Apps like these are inputs – systems you use to receive and manage information. Excessive inputs are probably keeping you from achieving peak productivity. To actually boost productivity, you need to streamline your inputs.

Do you get emails to three different addresses? Divert them all to a single account. Do you get paper and online bank statements? Keep one and cancel the other. When you get a message on one social media platform, are you immediately notified through another platform? Mute those notifications. In fact, mute all your non-essential notifications!

Information overload can induce serious stress. Streamlining your inputs limits the channels through which information can reach you and makes coping with it much more manageable.

Eating to 80%

The magic Okinawan diet is based on variety and small portions.

The Japanese diet has been in the spotlight for years, ever since Japan made a name for itself as the country with the longest life expectancy. That being said, people live even longer in Okinawa province. To find out why, Makoto Suzuki, a heart specialist from Ryukyus University in Okinawa, did several studies on the Okinawan diet, beginning in the 1970s. Here's what he found out:

First, the Okinawan diet contains an incredible variety of foods. In fact, locals of this island eat up to 206 different foods on a regular basis, including a number of herbs and spices. For instance, every day, they eat five separate portions of fruits and vegetables. They like to determine that they're getting enough variety by ensuring their plates contain all the colors of the rainbow.

It could be thanks to this variety that the Okinawan diet is otherwise quite plain. The base of the diet is grains, like rice or noodles, while seasonings like salt and sugar are used sparingly. In fact, Okinawans eat 60 percent less sugar and 50 percent less salt than other Japanese natives, who already eat a diet that's relatively healthy by global standards.

So, variety is important, but so is small portion size. To abide by this second aspect, Okinawans say that you should stop eating when you're around 80 percent full; in other words, you should remain a little bit hungry.

There's even a word for this concept in Japanese. It's called hara hachi bu, and simple ways to achieve it include avoiding dessert or reducing portion size.

To practice the latter, Okinawans typically serve their food on small plates, with portions of rice, vegetables, miso soup and a small snack, such as edamame beans.

They instinctively know that eating less is good for you, and modern science has actually confirmed the benefits of calorie reduction. By eating fewer calories, you can limit the level of a protein known as insulin-like growth factor 1. When too much of this protein exists in the body, cells age faster. As a result, eating less directly correlates to a longer life.


Procrastination

Procrastination is a strategy to avoid fear of failure.

Procrastination is a problem most of us are familiar with. In spite of its prevalence, procrastination is typically tied to very specific situations.

Usually, we procrastinate on work, that is, when there is a certain task we're required to perform like writing a report, organizing a seminar or making a presentation in front of a team.

These tasks are all significant and not part of your routine. You don't procrastinate going to the bathroom or answering a colleague who wants to take you to lunch, but you might put off starting an important presentation.

In fact, the types of tasks we procrastinate on usually have three important characteristics:

First, when you want to do a good job on something so you can live up to others' and your own expectations.

Second, you find the work dull. It's no fun and getting started, for example, writing the first page or filling up PowerPoint slides takes motivation.

Finally, it's unclear what qualifies as a "good job": you simply don't know how to live up to others' expectations and deliver a great presentation or write an outstanding report. What is "good?" What is "good enough?" And what if you pour your heart and soul into a project that completely fails?

When faced with these kinds of tasks, the inevitable consequence is a choice between two options:

If you start working on the task, you spend your time on something boring, plus you risk failing and disappointing both yourself and others as well.

If you don't start working, you can avoid this boredom, uncertainty and the fear of failure.

So what do you choose? Most likely, you'll choose the second strategy and delay the unpleasantness associated with your task. And, in a certain sense, it works: you learn that procrastination helps you avoid boredom and fear of failure – at least temporarily.

If you want others to like you, don’t criticize them.

Famous airplane test pilot Bob Hoover was flying back from an air show in San Diego when all of sudden both of his engines cut out. Through some impressive flying he was able to land the plane, saving those on board. Unfortunately, the aircraft was badly damaged.

The reason for the harrowing engine failure was that the World War Two propeller plane had been accidentally filled with jet fuel.

Back at the airport, Hoover saw the mechanic who had made the mistake. The young man was in tears, knowing how furious Hoover must be over the loss of his expensive airplane and the danger posed to the three people on board.

So did Hoover yell at him? Scold him? Criticize him?

Not at all. In fact, Hoover said that to demonstrate his faith in the mechanic having learned his lesson, he'd like the same mechanic to service his plane the next day.

The reason for Hoover's benevolence was perhaps that he knew something that psychologist B.F. Skinner had discovered a long time ago: animals rewarded for good behavior will learn more effectively than those punished for bad behavior.

The same is true of people: criticizing them won't encourage them to change their behavior because they're not primarily driven by reason but by emotion. Thus the person you criticize won't truly listen to what you're saying. They'll just feel like they're under attack, and their natural reaction will be to dig in and fight back.

So while voicing criticism might help you blow off steam, in the long-term, it will just make others like you less.

Many successful people actually made it a habit to never openly criticize others. Benjamin Franklin, for instance, claimed that the secret of his success was to "speak ill of no man."

Abraham Lincoln learned this lesson as well. He used to publicly criticize his opponents until one day his criticism so offended someone that he was challenged to a saber duel! The duel was only called off at the last instant, and from then on, he stopped openly criticizing others. Even during the Civil War he famously told those who spoke harshly of the Southerners, "Don't criticize them; they are just what we would be under similar circumstances."

Criticizing someone is easy, but it takes character to be understanding and to forgive others for their mistakes and shortcomings.

So if you want others to like you, think about why they did what they did, accept their shortcomings and make it a rule to never criticize them openly.


Teams that offer psychological safety are happier and more productive.

In a 2013 experiment, members of eight teams in an upcoming business school pitch competition were asked questions, including whether they liked horror movies and whether they got annoyed by spelling mistakes. The data-scientist running the experiment, Alastair Shepherd, knew nothing about the team members' business experiences, intelligence or leadership abilities. However, he accurately predicted the ranking of the eight teams in the subsequent competition, using only the quiz answers. That's because teams perform better if they're tolerant and welcoming of different perspectives.

There's plenty of evidence to back up this idea – what matters in a team is not the seniority or experience of the people involved, but their attitudes toward each other. And what really matters is the extent of psychological safety within the group. This is measurable by the degree to which members of the group feel free and able to propose ideas and thoughts without any risk of embarrassment.

When Google analyzed 200 teams in 2012, it found that the best performers were those who were part of teams with high levels of psychological safety. Not only were they less likely to quit; they were also twice as often described as effective by their superiors.

When teams aren't psychologically safe, performance suffers. A 2017 Wall Street Journal article recounted a simulation in which teams of doctors treated a supposedly sick mannequin. Some teams were assigned an observer who then treated them rudely, belittling their efforts during the simulation. These teams made serious mistakes, like misdiagnosis or failure to ventilate properly.

So if you're in a leadership position, how can you help create an environment of psychological safety? Well, a fun way to show that it's okay for your team members to share their ideas is to kick off discussions with a bad idea brainstorm – asking for deliberately absurd ideas. Taking the pressure off a little will loosen things up when it comes to the serious discussion.

Another way to encourage diverse ideas, particularly if there are introverts in a team, may be to ask everyone to write down their thoughts. Then the group leader can share them aloud and invite follow-up discussion. This way, it's possible to build a foundational framework for a safe, thoughtful exchange of ideas.

Taking control of our possessions helps us to take stock and reflect on the rest of our lives.

Taking control of our possessions helps us to take stock and reflect on the rest of our lives.

Many of us struggle to keep an orderly home or workspace. What's the big deal, we tell ourselves, if things are a little messy? Unfortunately, in truth, the tidiness of your external surroundings can have a bigger impact on your inner peace than you might think. In other words, your overflowing desk drawers and jumbled wardrobe are not a trivial issue. They're getting in the way of your happiness.

Importantly, clearing up our stuff and taking control of our possessions can give us a sense of control in other areas of life. Just consider the author's friend, who once remarked that when she eventually cleaned and organized her fridge, she finally realized that she could change her career as well.

What's the connection between your fridge and your work life? It all comes down to the promise of new possibilities.

When the food in our refrigerator or the dirty clothes in our laundry basket start to accumulate, we feel a creeping sense of paralysis. Working ourselves free of the mess we've created can start to feel like an insurmountable task. So we freeze up and get stuck in a trapped frame of mind.

But when we finally shift all that clutter or throw out all that old food, our sense of hopelessness will be replaced by a feeling of renewal. And we'll start thinking about the future again: what do we want to buy, and what sort of lifestyle do we want? This is what happened to the author's friend. As she was throwing out old mayonnaise and jam jars, removing stains and carefully arranging her condiments, she saw that there was a possibility for her to change her working environment too.

Crucially, getting your external world in order also means prioritizing the here and now, as well as looking to the future. Once you're no longer crowding your house with those giant stuffed toys your children played with as babies, you'll be able to reflect on your family as it is right now, not as it was several years ago.



Productivity lessons: Ignore perfectionism and seek effectiveness

To get things done in a team, put someone in charge.

In a team, if the responsibility for a project is distributed equally among team members, no one person will feel that they're in charge. Consequently, nothing will get done – not on time, at least. But if you ensure that one team member is made responsible for the whole team's outcome, the chances that important tasks will be actioned increase dramatically.

Be organized but flexible. 

Don't try to manage every little aspect of your work, as this won't make you more productive. Instead, it will consume too much of your precious time and energy – resources that are better used elsewhere. Of course, you do need to have an organizational plan, but it should be flexible at the same time.

Ignore perfectionism and seek effectiveness 

At one time or another, you've probably spent so much time on small, simple tasks that you never got around to completing the tasks that truly matter. That's why, when doing work, it's important to get the smaller pieces out of the way right off the bat.

After all, spending too much time on a small, low-priority task will waste both your time and your patience. So instead of allocating a lot of time to work that's not super important, do the simple things quickly to free up more time for the meatier tasks.

For instance, each day you'll be faced with different requests from your colleagues, your boss and your family. As these tasks come in, it's important to decide as quickly as possible whether or not you're going to handle them. If you are, it's then up to you to do so hastily.

A good approach here is to apply the OHIO principle, also known as "Only Handle it Once." For example, say you receive an email inviting you to a conference. You quickly browse the email then set it aside. Three days later, you remember the message, but don't remember the name of the sender. As a result, you spend countless minutes scrolling back through your inbox. From there, you've got to read it again, wasting yet more time!

On the other hand, if you were using the OHIO principle, you'd check if the date was free and the topic interesting and make a decision straight away.

Another way to move forward with your work, is to fight the temptation to be perfect when it comes to your low-priority tasks. Remember that not everything needs to be done flawlessly. You should reserve this privilege for your top-level work, since this is what your boss will see and judge.

Nobody is going to be pleased if you spend loads of time answering meaningless emails, so handle such tasks accordingly: get through them quickly and move on to the important stuff.